The purpose of this study was to examine whether an inverse relationship exists between defensive repression and empathy. Defensive repression was assessed by scores of 16 male and 28 female freshmen of a religious college on the Byrne Repression-Sensitization Scale and the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Empathy was assessed by Carkhuff's rating procedures for empathy and four scales of the Personal Orientation Inventory. Defensive repressors were significantly less empathic than nondefensive repressors on written responses. Defensive repressors scored significantly lower on the Feeling Reactivity scale and the Acceptance of Aggression scale of the Personal Orientation Inventory. The Existentiality and Capacity for Intimate Contact scales did not discriminate between the two groups. 43800 Biola Ave., La Mirada, CA 90639.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrunerJ. S.PostmanL.Emotional selectivity in perception and reaction. Journal of Personality, 1947, 16, 69–77. (a)
2.
BrunerJ. S.PostmanL.Tension and tension-release as organizing factors in perception. Journal of Personality, 1947, 15, 300–308. (b)
3.
ByrneD.The repression-sensitization scale: rationale, reliability, and validity. Journal of Personality, 1961, 29, 334–349.
4.
ByrneD.Repression-sensitization as a dimension of personality. In MaherB. A. (Ed.), Progress in experimental personality research. New York: Academic Press, 1964. Pp. 169–220.
5.
ByrneD.BarryJ.Relation of the revised repression-sensitization scale to measures of self-description. Psychological Reports, 1963, 13, 323–334.
6.
CameronN.Personality development and psychopathology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1963.
7.
CarkhuffR. R.Helping and human relations. Vol. 2. Practice and research. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1969. (a)
8.
CarkhuffR. R.Helping and human relations. Vol. 1. Selection and training. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1969. (b)
9.
CarkhuffR. R.BerensonB. G.Beyond counseling and therapy. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1967.
10.
CrowneD. P.MarloweD. A.A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1960, 24, 349–354.
11.
FenichelO.The psychoanalytical theory of neurosis. New York: Norton, 1945.
12.
FreudS.My views on the part played by sexuality in the aetiology of the neuroses (1906). In Standard Edition. Vol. VII. London: Hogarth Press, 1953.
13.
FreudS.On the history of the psychoanalytic movement (1914). In Standard Edition. Vol. XIV. London: Hogarth Press, 1953.
14.
GuilfordJ. P.Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. (4th ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill, 1965.
15.
HolroydD.Repression-sensitization, Marlowe-Crowne defensiveness, and perceptual defense. Proceedings of the 80th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 1972, 8, 401–402.
16.
JoyV.Repression-sensitization and interpersonal behavior. Paper presented at the 71st annual convention of the American Psychological Association, August 30, 1963.
17.
KahnM.SchillT.Anxiety report in defensive and nondefensive repressors. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1971, 36, 300.
18.
LazarusR. S.AlfertE.Short-circuiting of threat by experimentally altering cognitive appraisal. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1964, 69, 195–205.
19.
LefcourtH. M.Need for approval and threatened negative evaluation as determinants of expressiveness in a projective test. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1969, 33, 96–102.
20.
LomontJ. F.The repression-sensitization dimension in relation to anxiety responses. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1965, 29, 84–86.
21.
MadisonP.Freud's concept of repression and defense. Minneapolis: Univer. of Minnesota Press, 1961.
22.
ParsonO. A.FulgenzieF. B.EdelbergR.Aggressiveness and psychophysiological responsivity in groups of repressors and sensitizers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1969, 12, 235–244.
23.
PetzelT. P.GyntherM. D.Task performance of repressors and sensitizers under ego-oriented versus task-oriented instructions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1968, 32, 486–487.
24.
RosenstockI. M.Perceptual aspects of repression. American Psychologist, 1950, 5, 306–307.
25.
SchillT.AlthoffM.Auditory perceptual thresholds for sensitizers, defensive and nondefensive repressors. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1968, 27, 935–938.
26.
SchillT.BlackJ.Differences in reactions to Rozenzweig's P-F study by defensive and nondefensive repressors and sensitizers. Psychological Reports, 1969, 25, 929–930.
27.
SchillT.EmmanuelG.PedersonV.SchneiderL.WachowiakD.Sexual responsivity of defensive and nondefensive sensitizers and repressers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1970, 35, 44–47.
28.
SchwartzM. S.KruppN. E.ByrneD.Repression-sensitization and medical diagnosis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1971, 78, 286–291.
29.
SearsR. R.Survey of objective studies of psychoanalytic concepts. New York: Social Science Research Council, 1943. (Bulletin 51)
30.
SilberL. D.GrebsteinL. C.Repression-sensitization and social desirability responding. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1964, 28, 559.
31.
TruaxC. B.CarkhuffB. B.Toward effective counseling and psychotherapy. Chicago: Aldine, 1967.
32.
WarehimeR. G.FouldsM. L.Social desirability response sets and a measure of self-actualization. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 1973, 13, 89–95.
33.
WeinsteinJ.AverillJ. R.OptonE. M.LazarusR.Defensive style and discrepancy between self-report and physiological indexes of stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968, 10, 406–413.
34.
WlllettE. A.HeilbronnM.Repression-sensitization and discrepancy between self-report and official report of illness. Journal of Psychology, 1972, 81, 161–166.
35.
ZellerA. F.An experimental analogue of repression: I. Historical summary. Psychological Bulletin, 1950, 47, 39–51.
