Changes over time for a total of 137 individuals who were referred for multiple psychiatric examinations for competency were analyzed, using data on the evaluation of competency, psychiatric diagnoses, and criminal charges. Despite the fact that most of the subjects were repeatedly diagnosed as mentally ill, most of them were found competent. The only diagnoses which seemed to repeatedly be made were schizophrenia and mental retardation. The recurrence of certain serious criminal charges against the same defendants was reported and discussed. Suggestions for future research were made.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BluestoneH.MelellaJ.BaskinD.A study of criminal defendants seen for multiple psychiatric examination regarding their competency to stand trial. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 1981, 26, 131–142.
2.
CookG.JohnstonN.PogenyE.Factors affecting referral to determine competency to stand trial. American Journal of Psychiatry, 1973, 130, 870.
3.
Dusky v. United States. 362 U.S. 402, 1960.
4.
HennF. A.HerjanicM.VanderpearlR. H.Forensic psychiatry, anatomy of a service. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 1977, 18, 337–345.
5.
RoeschR. M.Competency to stand trial: an analysis of legal mental health issues and procedures and a proposal for change. Unpublished dissertation, Univer. of Michigan, Ann Arbor (Microfilm International), 1977.
6.
SteadmanH. J.Beating a rap: defendants found incompetent to stand trial. Chicago: Univer. of Chicago Press, 1979.
