A mock juror-simulation was utilized to determine the effect of observers' prior perpetration and victimization upon attributions of responsibility for an illegal act. 386 student subjects were presented a newspaper article depicting a court case of an individual being tried for one of two crimes, petty larceny or armed robbery. As predicted, prior victimization was significantly correlated with attributed responsibility. However, a significant relationship was not found between prior perpetration and attributed responsibility.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ErlangerH. S.Jury research in America: Its past and future. Law and Society Review, 1970, 4, 345–370.
2.
GerbasiK. C.ZuckermanM.ReissH. T.Justice needs a new blindfold: A review of mock jury research. Psychological Bulletin, 1977, 84, 323–345.
3.
GriffittW.JacksonT.Simulated jury decisions: The influence of jury-defendant attitude similarity-dissimilarity. Social Behavior and Personality, 1973, 1, 1–7.
4.
ShaverK. G.Defensive attribution: Effects of severity and relevance on the responsibility assigned for an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970, 14, 101–113.
