The Marital Communication Inventory was administered to a random sample of 238 female respondents in a midwestern community. Through common factor analysis, three factors were identified. A further correlational analysis indicates that the inventory is heavily contaminated by a marital conventionalization response set. Continued use of the inventory's total score as a unidimensional measure of marital communication cannot be recommended, although scales formed from the factors offer promise for research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndesD. A.An evaluation of a couple's relationship-building workshop: The use of video and small group feedback in teaching communication skills. (Doctoral dissertation, Univer. of Massachusetts, 1974) Dissertation Abstracts International, 1975, 35, 4637B–4638B.
2.
BeckD. F.Research findings on the outcomes of marital counseling. Social Casework, 1975, 56, 153–181.
3.
BienvenuM. J.Sr.A counselor's guide to accompany a marital communication inventory. Saluda: Family Life, 1978.
4.
BoydL. A.RoachA. J.Interpersonal communication skills differentiating more satisfying from less satisfying marital relationships. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1977, 24, 540–542.
5.
BruderA. H.Effects of a marriage enrichment program upon marital communication and adjustment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue Univer., 1972.
6.
CollinsJ. D.The effects of the conjugal relationship modification method on marital communication and adjustment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State Univer., 1971.
7.
CollinsJ. D.Experimental evaluation of a six-month conjugal therapy and relationship enhancement program. In GuerneyB. G.Jr. (Ed.), Relationship enhancement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1977. Pp. 192–226.
8.
ComreyA. L.Common methodological problems in factor analytic studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1978, 46, 648–659.
9.
CromwellR. E.OlsonD. H.FournierD. G.Diagnosis and evaluation in marital and family counseling. In OlsonD. H. L. (Ed.), Treating relationships. Lake Mills: Graphic, 1976. Pp. 517–562.
10.
CronbachL. J.Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 1951, 16, 297–334.
EdmondsV. H.Marital conventionalization: Definition and measurement. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1967, 29, 681–688.
13.
ElliottM. W.A study of communication and empathy in marital adjustment. (Doctoral dissertation, Univer., 1974) Dissertation Abstracts International, 1975, 35, 5972B.
14.
FigleyC. R.Child density and the marital relationship. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1973, 35, 272–282.
15.
FioritoB. A.Marital interaction among high and low adjusted couples: A comparison of participant and observer perceptions. (Doctoral dissertation, Univer., 1977) Dissertation Abstracts International, 1978, 39, 1135A.
16.
FuhsN. N.Marital communication as a predictor of marital perceptual accuracy. Unpublished M.S. thesis, Purdue Univer., 1975.
17.
GruberG. R.The relationship of self-concept and adjustment to gains achieved in the conjugal relationship enhancement program. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State Univer., 1973.
18.
HillW. F.The Hill Interaction Matrix: A method of studying interaction in psychotherapy groups. Los Angeles: Univer. of Southern California, 1965.
19.
HillW. F.A guide to understanding the structure and function of the Hill Interaction Matrix. Los Angeles: Univer. of Southern California, 1967.
20.
JacksonR. W.A summative evaluation of a “canned” communication workshop for parents of adolescents. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue Univer., 1977.
21.
LeeP. A.The relationship between marital communication and marital adjustment over the family life cycle. (Doctoral dissertation, Univer., 1979) Dissertation Abstracts International, 1979, 39, 6998A.
22.
LindR. W.Sex knowledge, birth control, and marital attitudes of a rural population. Journal of Home Economics Research, 1976, 5(1), 47–53.
23.
LockeH. J.WallaceK. M.Short marital adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity. Marriage and Family Living, 1959, 21, 251–255.
24.
MattesonR.Adolescent self-esteem, family communication, and marital satisfaction. Journal of Psychology, 1974, 86, 35–47.
25.
MillerS.NunnallyE. W.WackmanD. B.Alive and aware: Improving communication in relationships. Minneapolis: Interpersonal Communication Program, 1975.
26.
MurphyD. C.MendelsonL. A.Communication and adjustment in marriage: Investigating the relationship. Family Process, 1973, 12, 317–326. (a).
27.
MurphyD. C.MendelsonL. A.Use of the observational method in the study of live marital communication. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1973, 35, 356–363. (b).
28.
MursteinB. I.Marital Communication Inventory. In BurosO. K. (Ed.), The eighth mental measurements yearbook. Vol. 1. Highland Park: Gryphon, 1978. Pp. 478–479.
29.
NieN. H.HullC. H.JenkinsJ. G.SteinbrennerK.BentD. H.Statistical package for the social sciences. (2nd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill, 1975.
30.
O'LearyK. D.TurkewitzH.Methodological errors in marital and child treatment research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1978, 46, 747–758.
31.
PedersonJ. E.The relationship of spouse sex-role stereotyping to marital adjustment and communication. (Doctoral dissertation, Rosemead Graduate School of Psychology, 1977) Dissertation Abstracts International, 1911, 38, 1957B.
32.
PowersW. G.HutchinsonK.The measurement of communication apprehension in the marriage relationship. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1979, 41, 89–95.
33.
RappaportA. F.Effects of an intensive conjugal relationship modification program. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State Univer., 1971.
34.
SatirV.Peoplemaking. Palo Alto: Science and Behavior Books, 1972.
35.
SchiaviR. C.DerogatisL. R.KurianskyJ.O'ConnorD.SharpsL.The assessment of sexual function and marital interaction. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 1979, 5, 169–224.
36.
SchummW. R.FigleyC. R.JurichA. P.Dimensionality of the Marital Communication Inventory, a preliminary factor analytic study. Psychological Reports, 1979, 45, 123–128.
37.
SchummW. R.JacksonR. W.Marital communication or marital adjustment? a brief report on the Marital Communication Inventory. Psychological Reports, 1980, 46, 441–442.
38.
SelbyJ. E.Marital adjustment and marital communication of doctoral students and their wives. (Doctoral dissertation, Univer. of Missouri, Columbia, 1972) Dissertation Abstracts International, 1973, 33, 5502A–5503A.
39.
SpanierG. B.Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1976, 38, 15–28.
