Primary waking suggestibility has been related to both instrumental and classical conditioning. The nature of language mediational processes in suggestibility is most closely connected with classical conditioning mechanisms. However, methodological and empirical difficulties render ambiguous the previous research on classical conditioning interpretations. The present study extended the procedures for language (higher-order classical) conditioning of evaluative word meaning to investigate the nature and function of suggestibility. The results were that the classical conditioning of word meaning was not predicted by suggestibility. These and other data indicate that suggestibility is not mediated by classically conditioned verbal processes but may be based on instrumental conditioning functions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarberT. X.Physiological effects of “hypnotic suggestions”: A critical review of recent research. Psychological Bulletin, 1965, 63, 201–222.
2.
DasJ. P.Hypnosis, verbal satiation, vigilance and personality factors: A correlational study. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1964, 68, 72–78.
3.
DasJ. P.Relation between semantic satiation and verbal conditioning. British Journal of Psychology, 1966, 57, 87–91.
4.
DasJ. P.Body-sway suggestibility and semantic satiation. British Journal of Psychology, 1968, 59, 17–21.
5.
DasJ. P.O'ConnorN.Body-sway suggestibility in paranoid and nonparanoid schizophrenics. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 1959, 7, 121–128.
6.
EvansF. J.Suggestibility in the normal waking state. Psychological Bulletin, 1967, 67, 114–129.
7.
EvansI. M.Classical conditioning. In FeldmanM. P.BroadhurstA. (Eds.), Theoretical and experimental bases of the behaviour therapies. New York: Wiley, 1976. Pp. 73–112.
8.
EysenckH. J.Dimensions of personality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1947.
9.
FurneauxE. D.Hypnotic susceptibility as a function of waking suggestibility. In LeCronL. (Ed.). Experimental hypnosis. New York: Macmillan, 1952. Pp. 115–136.
10.
HekmatH.LeeY. B.Conditioning of affective self-references as a function of semantic meaning of verbal reinforcers. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1970, 76, 427–433.
11.
JenkinsJ. J.RussellW. A.SuaG. J.An atlas of semantic profiles for 360 words. American Journal of Psychology, 1958, 71, 688–699.
12.
LohrJ. M.Concurrent conditioning of evaluative meaning and imagery. British Journal of Psychology, 1976, 67, 353–358.
13.
LohrJ. M.StaatsA. W.Attitude conditioning in Sine-Tibetan languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 26, 196–200.
14.
OsgoodC. E.SuciG. J.TannenbaumP. H.The measurement of meaning. Urbana, IL: Univer. of Illinois Press, 1957.
RotterJ. B.Generalized expectancies for internal vs external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 1966, 80, No. 1 (Whole No. 609).
17.
SouheaverG. T.SchuldtW. J.Effects of differences in suggestibility within self- and external-control conditions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1978, 46, 1230–1233.
18.
StaatsA. W.Learning, language and cognition. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1968.
19.
StaatsA. W.StaatsC. K.Attitudes established by classical conditioning. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1958, 57, 37–40.
20.
StaatsA. W.StaatsC. K.Effect of number of trials in the language conditioning of meaning. Journal of General Psychology, 1959, 61, 211–223.
21.
StukatK. G.Suggestibility: A factorial and experimental analysis. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell, 1958.
22.
WatersJ. E.KodmanF.Abstract conditioning. Journal of Psychology, 1962, 53, 441–452.
23.
WebbR. A.Suggestibility and verbal conditioning. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 1962, 10, 275–279.
24.
WeissR. L.UllmannL. P.KrasnerL.On the relationship between hypnotizability and response to verbal operant conditioning. Psychological Reports, 1960, 6, 59–60.
25.
WhitmanJ. R.Suggestibility in schizophrenia. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1961, 17, 203–205.
