141 nurses described interviews reviewing recent performance. 8 process characteristics and 6 outcomes were examined. All measures were used previously by other researchers. 5 process characteristics were related to most of the outcomes. Specific findings were consistent with previous conclusions. Thus consensus on characteristics of effective appraisal interviews experienced by subordinates emerges.
BurkeR. J.GoodaleJ. G.Developing behaviorally anchored rating scales for evaluating nursing performance. Journal of Hospital Administration, 1973, 47, 62–69.
3.
BurkeR. J.GoodaleJ. G.Developing a common performance evaluation system for all employees of a hospital. Hospital Administration in Canada, 1975, 17, 26–30.
4.
BurkeR. J.KemballL.Performance appraisal: some issues in the process. Canadian Journal of Personnel and Industrial Relations, 1971, 18, 25–34.
5.
BurkeR. J.WilcoxD. S.Characteristics of effective employee performance review and development interviews. Personnel Psychology, 1969, 22, 291–305.
GrellerM. M.Subordinate participation and reaction to the appraisal interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60, 544–549.
8.
McConkeyD. P.How to manage by results. New York: American Management Assn, 1965.
9.
NemeroffW. F.WexleyK. N.Relationships between performance appraisal interview characteristics and interview outcomes as perceived by supervisors and subordinates. Paper presented at the, 1977 Academy of Management meeting, Orlando, Florida.
10.
OdiorneG. S.Personnel administration by objectives. Homewood, IL: Irwin, 1971.
11.
WexleyK. N.SinghJ. P.YuklG. A.Subordinate personality as a moderator of the effects of participation in three types of appraisal interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1973, 58, 54–59.
