27 supervisors of nursing personnel and 270 of their subordinates described interviews in which performance was reviewed. 8 process characteristics and 6 outcomes were examined. Most of these measures were previously used in investigations of subordinates' experiences. 4 process characteristics were significantly related to most of the outcome variables. Supervisors and subordinates showed high agreement on the characteristics of effective reviews of performance. Implications for enhancing effects of training programs for developing skills in conducting interviews in which performance is reviewed are proposed.
BurkeR. J.KemballL.Performance appraisal: Some issues in the process. Canadian Journal of Personnel and Industrial Relations, 1971, 18, 25–34.
3.
BurkeR. J.WeitzelW.WeirT.Characteristics of effective employee performance review and development interviews: Replication and extension. Personnel Psychology, 1978, 31, 903–920.
4.
BurkeR. J.WeitzelW.WeirT.Characteristics of effective employee performance review and development interviews: One more time. Psychological Reports, 1980, 47, 683–695.
5.
BurkeR. J.WilcoxD. S.Characteristics of effective employee performance review and development interviews. Personnel Psychology, 1969, 22, 291–305.
6.
FrenchJ. R. P.MeyerH. H.KayE.Participation and the appraisal system. Human Relations, 1966, 19, 3–20.
7.
GrellerM. M.Subordinate participation and reaction to the appraisal interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60, 541–549.
8.
HallD. T.LawlerE. E.Unused potential in research and development organizations. Research Management, 1969, 12, 339–354.
9.
KayE.MeyerH. H.FrenchJ. R. P.The effect of threat in a performance appraisal interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1965, 49, 311–317.
10.
KindallA. F.GatzaJ.Positive program for performance appraisal. Harvard Business Review, 1963, 41, 153–166.
11.
LathamG. O.YuklG. A.Assigned versus participative goal setting with educated and uneducated wood workers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60, 299–302.
12.
LikertR.New patterns of management. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1961.
13.
MaierN. R. F.The appraisal interview. New York: Wiley, 1958.
14.
MaierN. R. F.Psychology in industrial organization. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1973.
15.
MaierN. R. F.HoffmanL. R.HoovenJ. J.ReadW. H.Superior-subordinate communication in management. New York: American Management Association, 1961. (Research Study 52).
16.
McGregorD.The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960.
17.
MeyerH. H.KayE.FrenchJ. R. P.Split roles in performance appraisal. Harvard Business Review, 1965, 43, 123–129.
18.
NemeroffW. F.WexleyK. N.Relationships between performance appraisal interview characteristics and interview outcomes as perceived by supervisors and subordinates. Paper presented at the 1977 meeting of the Academy of Management, August, 1977, Orlando, Florida.
WexleyK. N.SinghJ. P.YuklG. A.Subordinate personality as a moderator of the effects of participation in three types of appraisal interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1973, 58, 54–59.
