The present study assessed the usefulness of employing the Goodenough-Harris Draw-A-Person Test for investigating depressive symptoms in children. Subjects were 166 boys and 182 girls whose combined mean age was 10.53 yr. (SD = .78). Structural characteristics obtained from the group-administered test were size of figure drawn, vertical placement of figure on a page, and intensity of lines drawn. Depression was assessed by three independent methods: peer nominations, self-ratings, and teacher assessments. No significant relationships were obtained between intensity of line, vertical placement, and depression. A significant negative relationship was obtained between size of figure drawn and teacher-rated depression, for girls only. Present findings are consistent with previous research questioning the validity of utilizing structural characteristics of human figure drawing for assessing depression in children.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BennettV.Does size of figure drawing reflect self concept?Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1964, 28, 285–286.
2.
BennettV.Combinations of figure drawing characteristics related to drawer's self-concept. Journal of Projective Techniques, 1966, 30, 192–196.
3.
CoopersmithS.SakaiD.BeardsleeB.CoopersmithA.Figure drawing as an expression of self-esteem. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1976, 40, 370–375.
4.
CraddickR. A.Draw-A-Person characteristics of psychopathic prisoners and college students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1962, 15, 11–13.
5.
ExnerJ. E.A comparison of the human figure drawings of psychoneurotics, character disturbances, normals, and subjects experiencing experimentally induced fear. Journal of Projective Techniques, 1962, 26, 392–397.
6.
GoldsteinA. P.RawnM. L.The validity of interpretive signs of aggression in the drawing of the human figure. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1957, 13, 169–171.
7.
GrayD. M.PepitoneA.Effect of self-esteem on drawings of the human figure. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1964, 28, 452–455.
8.
GuinanJ. F.HurleyJ. R.An investigation of the reliability of human figure drawings. Journal of Projective Techniques, 1965, 29, 300–304.
9.
HammerM.KaplanA.The reliability of size of children's drawings. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1964, 20, 121.
10.
HammerM.KaplanA.The reliability of children's human figure drawings. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1966, 22, 316–319.
11.
HandlerL.ReyherJ.Figure drawing anxiety indices: A review of the literature. Journal of Projective Techniques, 1965, 29, 305–313.
12.
HarrisD. B.Children's drawings as measures of intellectual maturity. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1963.
13.
HoytT. E.BaronM. R.Anxiety indices in some sex drawings of psychiatric patients with high and low MAS scores. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1958, 23, 448–452.
14.
KovacsM.BeckA. T.An empirical-clinical approach towards a definition of childhood depression. In SchulterbrandtJ. G.RaskinA. (Eds.), Depression in childhood: Diagnosis, treatment, and conceptual models. New York: Raven Press, 1977. Pp. 1–26.
15.
LakinM.Formal characteristics of human figure drawings by institutionalized and non-institutionalized aged. Journal of Gerontology, 1960, 15, 76–78.
16.
LefkowitzM. M.Aggression and size of human figure drawings. Psychology in the Schools, 1964, 1, 312–314.
17.
LefkowitzM. M.Effects of diphenylhydanion on disruptive behavior. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1969, 20, 643–651.
18.
LefkowitzM. M.Rejection and depression: Prospective and contemporaneous analyses. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Psychological Association, Honolulu, Hawaii, May, 1980.
19.
LefkowitzM. M.TesinyE. P.Assessment of childhood depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1980, 48, 43–50.
20.
LewinsohnP. M.Relationship between height of figure drawings and depression in psychiatric patients. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1964, 28, 380–381.
21.
MachoverK.Personality projection in the drawing of the human figure. Springfield, IL: Thomas, 1949.
22.
McHughA.H-T-P proportion and perspective in Negro, Puerto Rican, and white children. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1963, 19, 312–314.
23.
NunnallyJ. C.Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
24.
PihlR.NimrodG.The reliability and validity of the Draw-A-Person test in IQ and personality assessment. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1976, 32, 470–472.
25.
PrytulaR. E.LeighG. G.Absolute and relative figure drawing size in institutionalized orphans. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1972, 28, 377–379.
26.
ReznikoffM.NicholasA.An evaluation of human figure drawing indicators of paranoid pathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1958, 22, 395–397.
27.
RobackH.Human figure drawings: Their utility in the clinical psychologist's armamentarium for personality assessment. Psychological Bulletin, 1968, 70, 1–19.
28.
RobackH.WebersinnA.The size of figure drawings of depressed psychiatric patients. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1966, 71, 416.
29.
SopchakA. L.Anxiety indicators on the Draw-A-Person Test for clinic and nonclinic boys and their parents. Journal of Psychology, 1970, 76, 251–260.
30.
StarrS.MarcuseF. L.Reliability in the Draw-A-Person Test. Journal of Projective Techniques, 1959, 23, 83–86.
31.
SundbergN. D.The practice of psychological testing in clinical services in the United States. American Psychologist, 1961, 16, 79–83.
32.
SwensenC. H.Empirical evaluation of human figure drawings. Psychological Bulletin, 1957, 54, 431–466.
33.
SwensenC. H.Empirical evaluation of human figure drawings: 1957–1966. Psychological Bulletin, 1968, 70, 20–44.
