This study investigated the relationship between belief in personal control and Kohlberg's stages of moral reasoning. Responses of 57 male and 56 female pupils of two residential secondary schools in Kano City indicated that subjects at Stage 3 of moral reasoning tended to exhibit significantly more internality than those at Stages 1, 2, and 4. Significant sex differences were found neither in belief in personal control nor in moral reasoning.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams-WebberJ. R.Generalized expectancies concerning locus of control reinforcements and the perception of moral sanctions. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1969, 8, 340–343.
2.
BarlingJ.FinchamF.Locus of control beliefs in male and female Indian and white school children in South Africa. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1978, 9, 227–235.
3.
BloombergM.SonesonS.The effects of locus of control and field independence-dependence on moral reasoning. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1976, 128, 59–66.
4.
DuskaR.WhelanM.Moral development: A guide to Piaget and Kohlberg. Dublin: Gill & Macmillan, 1977.
5.
JanzenH. L.BoersmaF. J.Locus of control and its relationship to moral development. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 1976, 22(3), 237–244.
6.
JoeV. C.A review of the internal-external control construct as a personality variable. Psychological Reports, 1971, 28, 619–640. (Monogr. Suppl. 3-V28).
7.
JohnsonC. D.GormlyJ.Academic cheating: The contribution of sex, personality, and situational variables. Developmental Psychology, 1972, 6, 320–325.
8.
KohlbergL.The development of modes of moral thinking and choice in the years ten to sixteen. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univer. of Chicago, 1958.
9.
KohlbergL.Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In GoslinD. (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1969. Pp. 347–480.
10.
KohlbergL.From is to ought (How to commit the naturalistic fallacy and get away with it in the study of moral development). In MischelT. (Ed.), Cognitive development and epistemology. New York: Academic Press, 1971. Pp. 151–235.
11.
KohlbergL.Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive developmental approach. In LickonaT. (Ed.), Moral development and behavior: Theory, research, and social issues. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1976. Pp. 31–53.
12.
McGinniesE.NordholmL. A. L.WardC. D.BhanthumnavinD. L.Sex and cultural differences in perceived locus of control among students in five countries. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974, 42, 451–455.
13.
MidlarskyE.Aiding under stress: The effects of competence, dependency, visibility, and fatalism. Journal of Personality, 1971, 39, 132–149.
14.
ParsonsO. A.SchneiderJ. M.Cross-national stereotypes of locus of control in university students. International Journal of Psychology, 1978, 13, 185–196.
15.
PiagetJ.The moral judgment of the child. London: Kegan Paul, 1932.
16.
ReitzH. J.GroffG. K.Economic development and belief in locus of control among factory workers in four countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1974, 5, 344–355.
17.
RotterJ. B.Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monograph: General and Applied, 1966, 80, No. 1 (Whole No. 609).
