The issue addressed concerns critical statements about the reliability of the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire and related instruments made without benefit of appropriate statistical significance tests. The position argued is that such conclusions are unwarranted.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychological Association.Standards for educational and psychological tests. Washington, D. C.: APA, 1974.
2.
BoltonB.Review of the 16 PF. In BurosO. K. (Ed.), The eighth mental measurements yearbook. Highland Park, N. J.: Gryphon Press, 1978. Pp. 1078–1080.
3.
BurosO. K. (Ed.) Personality tests and reviews II. Highland Park, N. J.: Gryphon Press, 1975.
4.
CattellR. B.EberH. W.TatsuokaM. M.Handbook for the 16 PF. Champaign, IL: IPAT, 1970.
5.
GruberJ. J.Comments on the reliability of a personality questionnaire used in physical education and sport research. International Journal of Sports Psychology, 1978, 9, 111–118.
6.
Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.Manual for the 16 PF. Champaign, IL: IPAT, 1972.
7.
SokalR. R.RohlfF. J.Biometry. San Francisco: Freeman, 1969.