A factor analysis of items in the Bern Sex-role Inventory, the Personal Attributes Questionnaire, and Heilbrun's Masculinity and Femininity scales yielded 11 factors. College students (n = 400) at a large midwestern university completed the items from the three instruments. The solution that emerged suggests that sex roles are multidimensional and that masculinity may be more factorially complex.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BemS. L.The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974, 42, 155–162.
2.
BemS. L.Sex-role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 31, 634–643.
3.
BemS. L.Probing the promise of androgyny. In KaplanA. G.BeanJ. P. (Eds.), Beyond sex-role stereotypes. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976. Pp. 47–62.
4.
BemS. L.On the utility of alternative procedures for assessing psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1977, 45, 196–205.
5.
BemS. L.LenneyE.Sex-typing and the avoidance of cross-sex behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 33, 48–54.
6.
BerzinsJ. I.WellingM. A.WetterR. E.A new measure of psychological androgyny based on the Personality Research Form. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1978, 46, 126–138.
7.
BlockJ. H.Conceptions of sex role: Some cross-cultural and longitudinal perspectives. American Psychologist, 1973, 28, 512–527.
8.
CattellR. B.The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1966, 1, 245–276.
9.
ConstantinopleA.Masculinity-femininity: An exception to a famous dictum?Psychological Bulletin, 1973, 80, 389–407.
10.
CosentinoF.HeilbrunA. B.Anxiety correlates of sex-role identity in college students. Psychological Reports, 1964, 14, 729–730.
11.
GaudreauP.Factor analyses of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1977, 42, 155–162.
12.
GrossR.BatlisN.SmallA.ErdwinsC.Factor structure of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory and the Personal Attributes Questionnaire. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1979, 47, 1122–1124.
13.
HarmanH. H.Modern factor analysis. (3rd ed.) Chicago: Univer. of Chicago Press, 1976.
14.
HeilbrunA. B.Measurement of masculine and feminine sex-role identities as independent dimensions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1976, 44, 183–190.
KellyJ. A.WorellJ.New formulations of sex roles and androgyny: A critical review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1977, 45, 1101–1115.
17.
LiuA. A.A theory-based scale for measurement of affective responses to personality and attitude inventories. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Iowa State Univer., 1971.
18.
PleckJ. H.Masculinity-femininity: Current and alternative paradigms. Sex Roles, 1975, 1, 161–178.
19.
SpenceJ. T.HelmreichR.Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin: Univer. of Texas, 1978.
20.
SpenceJ. T.HelmreichR.StappJ.The Personal Attributes Questionnaire: A measure of sex-role stereotypes and masculinity-femininity. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 1974, 4, 127.
21.
SpenceJ. T.HelmreichR.StappJ.Ratings of self and peers on sex-role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 32, 29–39.
22.
WakefieldJ. A.Jr.SasekJ.FriedmanA. F.BowdenJ. D.Androgyny and other measures of masculinity-femininity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1976, 44, 766–770.
23.
WarrenR. D.KlonglanG. E.SabriM. M.The certainty method: Its application and usefulness in developing empirical measures in social sciences. Rural Sociology Report No. 82, Iowa State Univer., Ames, IA, 1969.
24.
WolinsLDickinsonT. L.Transformations to improve reliability and/or validity for affective scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1973, 33, 711–713.
25.
WorellJ.Sex roles and psychological well-being: Perspectives on methodology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1978, 46, 777–791.
