Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Four groups of 16 students were given 120 acquisition trials and 60 extinction trials in a verbal choice task. One group was given 120 continuously reinforced trials, a second group was given 120 partially reinforced trials, a third group was given 60 partially reinforced trials followed by 60 continuously reinforced trials, and a fourth group was given 60 continuously reinforced trials followed by 60 partially reinforced trials. Subjects given partial reinforcement after continuous reinforcement were as resistant to extinction as subjects given partial reinforcement only, and both groups were more resistant to extinction than subjects given continuous reinforcement only. Subjects trained with the partial-continuous order of reinforcement schedules, however, were no more resistant to extinction than subjects trained with continuous reinforcement only.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Capaldi

A. B.

Capaldi

E. J.

Influence of pattern of events in sequence on resistance to extinction. Psychological Reports, 1963, 12, 343–347.

Cotler

S. B.

Nygaard

J. E.

Resistance to extinction following sequences of partial and continuous reinforcement in a human choice task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969, 81, 270–274.

deWolfe

A. S.

Extinction of conditioned verbal responses. American Journal of Psychology, 1962, 75, 265–270.

Dyal

J. A.

Sytsma

Relative persistence as a function of order of reinforcement schedules. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1976, 2, 370–375.

Essman

W. B.

“Learning without awareness” of responses to perceptual and verbal stimuli as a function of reinforcement schedule. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1959, 9, 15–25.

Jenkins

H. M.

Resistance to extinction when partial reinforcement is followed by regular reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1962, 64, 441–450.

Lewis

D. J.

Partial reinforcement: A selective review of the literature since 1950. Psychological Bulletin, 1960, 57, 1–28.

O'Connell

D. C.

Wagner

M. V.

Extinction after partial reinforcement and minimal learning as a test of both verbal control and PRE in concept learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1967, 73, 151–153.

Perry

S. L.

Moore

J. W.

The partial-reinforcement effect sustained through blocks of continuous reinforcement in classical eyelid conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1965, 69, 158–161.

10.

Peterson

M. J.

Verbal response strength as a function of cultural frequency, schedule of reinforcement, and number of trials. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1956, 52, 371–376.

11.

Theios

The partial reinforcement effect sustained through blocks of continuous reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1962, 64, 1–6.

12.

Theios

McGinnis

R. W.

Partial reinforcement before and after continuous reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1967, 73, 479–481.

Order of Partial and Continuous Reinforcement Schedules in Verbal Choice Behavior

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References