The issue of manipulation versus selection as a research strategy still seems to generate confusion. Present usage and past analyses of the issue are discussed. It is pointed out that the two approaches involve inferential problems at different points in the process of scientific generalization. Therefore, the strategies are complementary. Taken together, they can allow conclusions which neither alone could logically support.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrunswikE.Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology. Psychological Review, 1955, 62, 193–217.
2.
ButlerP. E.The relationship of depression to aggressive response intensity and state-trait anxiety. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univer. of Alabama, 1971.
3.
ChuvenH.The effects of depression, frustration, threat of retaliation and sex of target on physical aggression and anxiety change. Unpublished Master's thesis, Univer. of Alabama, 1973.
4.
CoffieldK. E.Research methodology: A possible reconciliation. American Psychologist, 1970, 25, 511–516.
5.
CronbachL. J.The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 1957, 12, 671–684.
6.
FeldmanC. F.HassW. A.Controls, conceptualization, and the interrelation between experimental and correlational research. American Psychologist, 1970, 25, 633–635.
7.
KaplanA.The conduct of inquiry; methodology for behavioral science. San Francisco: Chandler, 1964.
8.
MelvinK. B.Vicious circle behavior. In KimmelH. D. (Ed.), Experimental psychopathology: Recent research and theory. New York: Academic Press, 1971. Pp. 95–115.
9.
PetrinovichL.Probabilistic functionalism: A conception of research method. American Psychologist, 1979, 34, 373–390.
10.
SeligmanM. E. P.Helplessness: On depression, development, and death. San Francisco: Freeman, 1975.
11.
UnderwoodB. J.Psychological research. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1957.
