The relationship between rational thinking and belief in a just world was examined using scores on the Rational Behavior Inventory and the Just World Scale from 129 undergraduate students. It was hypothesized that rational thinking would be incompatible with absolutistic beliefs that the world is a just place. A Pearson coefficient of —.11 was computed between scores on the two scales; this supports the hypothesis that neither absolutistic acceptance nor rejection of a belief in a just world is related to rational thinking.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
EllisA.Reason and emotion in psychotherapy. New York: Lyle Stuart, 1962.
2.
EllisA.GribgerR.Handbook of rational emotive therapy. New York: Springer, 1977.
3.
RubinZ.PeplauL. A.Belief in a just world and reactions to another's lot: A study of participants in the national draft lottery. Journal of Social Issues, 1973, 29, 73–93.
4.
RubinZ.PeplauL. A.Who believes in a just world?Journal of Social Issues, 1975, 31, 65–89.
5.
ShorkeyC. T.ReyesE.Relationship between self-actualization and rational thinking. Psychological Reports, 1978, 42, 842.
6.
ShorkeyC. T.WhitemanV. L.Development of the Rational Behavior Inventory: Initial validity and reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1977, 37, 527–534.
7.
WhitemanV. L.ShorkeyC. T.Validation testing of the Rational Behavior Inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1978, 38, 1143–1149.
