In this research note technical properties of a Dutch triadic forced-choice Machiavellianism scale are examined. Data from 64 and 53 male college students in two surveys indicate that the reliabilities are in the .30s and rather low. Besides, the Dutch Mach V is not insensitive to a social desirability response-set; correlations in the .30s were found with a Social Desirability scale. Some solutions are mentioned.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BergsL. P.MartinB.The effect of instructional time interval and social desirability on the validity of a forced-choice anxiety scale. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1961, 25, 528–532.
2.
ChristieR.GeisF. L.Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press, 1970.
3.
HicksL. E.Some properties of ipsative, normative, and forced-choice normative measures. Psychological Bulletin, 1970, 74, 167–184.
4.
KrautR. E.PriceJ. D.Machiavellianism in parents and their children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 6, 782–786.
5.
RobinsonJ. R.ShaverP. R.Measures of social psychological attitudes. Ann Arbor: Institute of Social Research, 1973.
6.
RogersR. S.SeminG. R.Mach V: An improved scoring system based on a triadic choice model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 27, 825–837.
7.
VleemingR. G.Een aanzet tot een Machiavellisme-schaal. Gedrag, 1976, 4, 336348.
8.
VleemingR. G.Machiavellianism: A preliminary review. Psychological Reports, 1979, 44, 295–310.
WilliamsM. L.HazletonV.RenshawS.The measurement of Machiavellianism: A factor analytic and correlational study of Mach IV and Mach V. Speech Monographs, 1975, 42, 151–159.
11.
ZavalaA.Development of the forced-choice rating scale technique. Psychological Bulletin, 1965, 63, 117–124.