A field observational experiment was performed to assess the impact of prosocial television on the free play of preschool children over a 4-day period. Analysis of the data indicated that boys were significantly more aggressive than girls and that exposure to prosocial television had a strong short-term effect on both boys and girls in reducing three classes of aggressive behavior. A corresponding increase in prosocial behavior and rule obedience was not associated with exposure to prosocial television.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BanduraA.Influence of models' reinforcement contingencies on the acquisition of imitative responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1965, 1, 589–595. (a).
2.
BanduraA.Vicarious processes: Case of no-trial learning. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press, 1965. Pp. 1–55. (b).
3.
BanduraA.Social learning theory of identificatory processes. In GoslinD. A. (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research. Chicago: Rand-McNally, 1969. Pp. 213–262.
4.
BanduraA.RossD.RossS.Imitation of film-mediated aggressive models. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1963, 66, 3–11.
5.
FlandersJ. P.A review of research on imitative behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 1968, 69, 316–337.
6.
GerbnerG.Violence in television drama: Trends and symbolic functions. In ComstockG. A.RubinsteinE. A. (Eds.), Television and social behavior. Vol. 1. Washington, D. C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1972. Pp. 28–187.
7.
GerbnerG.GrossL.The scary world of T.V.'s heavy viewer. Psychology Today, 1976, 10(9), 41–45.
8.
HicksD. J.Imitation and retention of film-mediated aggressive peer and adult models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1965, 2, 97–100.
9.
LeiferA. D.Television and the development of social behavior. Paper presented at the biennial meetings of the International Society for the Study of Behavioral Development, Ann Arbor, 1973.
10.
LeiferA. D.RobertsD. F.Children's responses to television violence. In MurrayJ. P.RubinsteinE. A.ComstockG. A. (Eds.), Television and social behavior. Vol. 2. Washington, D. C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1972. Pp. 43–180.
11.
LesserG. S.Designing a program for broadcast television. In KortenF. F.CookS. W.LaceyG. L. (Eds.), Psychology and the problems of society. Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association, 1970. Pp. 208–214.
12.
LovaasO. I.Effect of exposure to symbolic aggression on aggressive behavior. Child Development, 1961, 32, 37–44.
13.
LyleJ.HoffmanH. R.Children's use of television and other media. In RubinsteinE. A.ComstockG. A.MurrayJ. P. (Eds.), Television and social behavior. Vol. 4. Washington, D. C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1972. Pp. 257–273.
14.
PaulsonF. L.McDonaldD. L.WhittemoreS. L.An evaluation of Sesame Street programming designed to teach cooperation behavior. Monmouth, Ore.: Teaching Research, 1972.
15.
SteinA. H.FriedrichL. K.VondracekF.Television content and young children's behavior. In MurrayJ. P.RubinsteinE. A.ComstockG. A. (Eds.), Television and social behavior. Vol. 2. Washington, D. C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1972. Pp. 202–317.
