Radical therapy is explored through its definition, assumptions, and limitations. An evaluation is offered placing it in a perspective of contributing to psychotherapists' recognition of the possible role of society in fostering emotional problems.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BellakL.Once over: What is psychotherapy? An editorial. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 1977, 165, 295–299.
2.
HalleckS. L.The politics of therapy. New York: Science House, 1971.
3.
HerronW. G.The power of psychotherapy: A reply to Hurvitz. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974, 42, 298–300.
4.
HerronW. G.Further thoughts on psychotherapeutic deprofessionalization. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 1975, 15, 65–73. (a).
HurvitzN.Psychotherapy as a means of social control. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1973, 40, 232–239.
7.
HurvitzN.Manifest and latent functions in psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974, 42, 301–302.
8.
HurvitzN.The status and tasks of radical therapy. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 1977, 14, 65–73.
9.
StruppH. H.BerginA. E.Some empirical and conceptual bases for coordinated research in psychotherapy: A critical review of issues, trends and evidence. International Journal of Psychiatry, 1969, 7, 18–90.
10.
TennovD.Psychotherapy: The hazardous cure. New York: Abelard-Shuman, 1975.
