The experiment shows that the presence of a government health warning on cigarette advertisements can “boomerang,” leading to an increased desire to smoke. 24 housewives saw a series of 25 cigarette advertisements; for 12 subjects the health warning was present and for 12 it was absent. Half the subjects in each group were smokers and half non-smokers. The presence of the warning increased the desire to smoke but the increase seems to be greater for smokers than for non-smokers. The presence of the warning decreases the perceived goodness of the advertisement but does not affect its perceived familiarity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
HeilmanM. E.Threats and promises: Reputational consequence and transfer of credibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1974, 10, 310–324.
2.
HeilmanM. E.GarnerK. A.Counteracting the boomerang: The effects of choice on compliance on threats and promises. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 31, 911–917.
3.
WhittakerJ. O.Opinion change as a function of communication and attitude discrepancy. Psychological Reports, 1963, 13, 763–772.
4.
WhittakerJ. O.Resolution of the communication discrepancy issue in attitude change. In SherifC.SherifM. (Eds.), Attitude, ego involvement and change. New York: Wiley, 1968. Pp. 159–177.
