Direct comparisons were made among four different conservation training procedures, reversibility training, compensation training, addidition/subtraction training and a verbal reinforcement method in order to determine which might best facilitate conservation acquisition in previously nonconserving first grade students. The data indicated that verbal methods stressing principles of reversibility and addition/subtraction resulted in the acquisition of concepts of conservation statistically comparable to that of a group of natural conservers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeilinH.Learning and operational convergence in logical thought development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1965, 2, 317–339.
2.
BrainerdC. J.Reinforcement and reversibility in quantity conservation acquisition. Psychonomic Science, 1972, 27, 114–116.
3.
BrainerdC. J.Learning research and Piagetian theory. In SiegelL. S.BrainerdC. J. (Eds.), Alternatives to Piaget: critical essays on the theory. New York: Academic Press, 1977. Pp. 69–109.
4.
BrainerdC. J.AllenT. W.Experimental inductions of the conservation of “first-order” quantitative invariants. Psychological Bulletin, 1971, 75, 128–144.
5.
GelmanR.Conservation acquisition: a problem of learning to attend to relevant attributes. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1969, 7, 167–187.
KirkR. E.Experimental design: procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1968.
9.
MurrayJ.Social learning and cognitive development: modeling effects on children's understanding of conservation. British Journal of Psychology, 1974, 65, 151–160.
10.
SjöbergL.HöijerB.OlssonI.Teaching conservation of weight by means of verbal instructions. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1970, 11, 266–273.
