Although judges most often make the final decision in cases of child abuse, the literature is relatively silent as to what they believe to be true about child abuse and neglect. From 224 district judges in the State of Texas, 36%, or 82, returned a 50-item questionnaire reasonably complete. The responses of these judges agreed with many major constructs in the literature on child abuse, but there were a number of important areas, e.g., family pathology, parent pathology, in which a majority of the judges differed from the literature. The 82 respondents showed considerable openness and flexibility in dealing with abuse.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlvyK. T.Preventing child abuse. American Psychologist, 1975, 30, 921–928.
2.
BishopF. I.Perception, memory, and pathological identification as precipitating factors in parental attacks on children. Medical Journal of Australia, 1975, 2, 243–245.
3.
DelaneyJ.The battered child and the law. In KempeC. H.HeiferR. E. (Eds.), Helping the battered child and his family. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1972. Pp. 187–207.
4.
FraserB. G.A pragmatic alternative to current legislative approaches to child abuse. American Criminal Law Review, 1974, 12, 103–124.
5.
GellesR. J.Child abuse as psychopathology: A sociological critique and reformulation. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1973, 43, 611–621.
6.
GilD. G.Violence against children: Physical child abuse in the U.S. Cambridge: Harvard Univer. Press, 1970.
7.
GreenF. C.Child abuse and neglect: A priority problem for the private physician. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 1975, 22(2), 329–339.
8.
HawkinsR.It's time we taught the young how to be good parents. Psychology Today, 1972, 5(11), 28–30, 36–40.
9.
HelferR. E.A self-instructional program on child abuse and neglect. With the cooperation of the Committee on Infant and Preschool Children of the American Academy of Pediatrics and the National Center for Prevention and Treatment of Child Abuse and Neglect, Denver, 1974.
10.
HelferR. E.The diagnostic process and treatment programs. (U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare Publication No. (OHD) 75–69)Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1975.
11.
JusticeB.JusticeR.The abusing family. New York: Human Sciences Press, 1976.
12.
KleinM.SternL.Low birthweight and the battered child syndrome. American Journal of Diseases in Childhood, 1971, 122, 15–18.
13.
PaulsenM. B.The law and abused children. In HelferR. E.KempeC. H. (Eds.), The battered child. (2nd ed.) Chicago: Univer. of Chicago Press, 1974. Pp. 153–178.
14.
PaulsonM.AfifiA.ChaleffA.ThomasonM.LiuV.An MMPI scale for identifying at risk abusive parents. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 1975, 4, 22–24.
15.
PollockC.SteeleB. F.A therapeutic approach to the parents. In KempeC. H.HelferR. E. (Eds.), Helping the battered child and his family. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1972. Pp. 3–21.
16.
RogersC. S.HicksM. W.Equal opportunity for children: A proposal for licensed parenthood. Paper presented at the Southeastern Society for Research in Child Development, Chapel Hill, N. C., March 7, 1974.
17.
SteeleB. F.PollockC.A psychiatric study of parents who abuse infants and small children. In HelferR. E.KempeC. H. (Eds.), The battered child. (2nd ed.) Chicago: Univer. of Chicago Press, 1974. Pp. 89–133.
18.
TerrL. C.WatsonA. S.The battered child rebrutalized: Ten cases of medical-legal confusion. American Journal of Psychiatry, 1968, 124, 126–133.
19.
Texas Legal Directory. Los Angeles: Legal Directories Publ., 1974.
