Abstract
In one partially reinforced and one continuously reinforced group, children made no response during training. One partially reinforced group picked up and ate candy which was presented contiguously with a light. One partially and one continuously reinforced group picked up the candy but did not eat it. One control group received no candy during training trials, and a second control group received no training. Extinction tests with the light contingent upon lever excursion indicated that a response during acquisition was not necessary to condition a secondary reinforcer, but strong effects were obtained by including a consummatory response. Stronger effects were obtained with a partial schedule and either no response or a consummatory response during acquisition trials.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
