Observers' reactions to, and internal justification of, the perceived victimization of another individual were investigated. Utilizing a “just world” model, three “perceived” conditions of victimization are employed: the innocent victim, the deserved victim, and the martyr. Several hypotheses are tested through the application of a two-way analysis of variance and several independent sample t tests. Only partial support for the “just world” model was demonstrated.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DavisK.JonesE.Changes in interpersonal perception as a means of reducing cognitive dissonance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1960, 61, 402–410.
2.
GlassD.Changes in liking as a means of reducing discrepancies between self-esteem and aggression. Journal of Personality, 1964, 32, 531–549.
3.
LernerM.Evaluation of performance as a function of performer's reward and attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1965, 1, 335–360.
4.
LernerM.Observer's evaluation of a victim: Justice, guilt and veridical perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971, 20, 127–135.
5.
LernerM.SimmonsC.Observers' reaction to the ‘innocent victim’: Compassion or rejection?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966, 4, 203–210.
6.
WalsterE.Assignment of responsibility for an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966, 3, 73–79.
