Two groups of 18 college students were given self-paced or traditional instruction toward the same objectives. Data showed low external locus of control, low endurance and high autonomy (Personality Research Form) predicted comprehension of self-paced students. Ratings of teachers by self-paced students were more positive.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BloomB. S. (Ed.) Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay, 1956.
2.
DotyB. A.Teaching method effectiveness in relation to certain student characteristics. Journal of Educational Research, 1967, 60, 363–365.
3.
EilersenH. J.Locus of control and achievement and participation in structured and unstructured introductory psychology courses. Dissertation Abstracts International, 1972, 33(5-A), 2164.
GrashaA. F.Observations on relating teaching goals to student response styles and classroom methods. American Psychologist, 1972, 27, 144–147.
6.
HohnR. L.Effectiveness of innovations in the teaching of psychology: a critique. Newsletter—Division on the Teaching of Psychology, American Psychological Association, 1973 December, 3–6.
7.
JacksonD. N.Personality Research Form—Form A. Goshen, N.Y.: Research Psychologists Press, 1968.
8.
LordF. M.NovickM. R.Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1968.
9.
NieN. H.HullC. H.JenkinsJ. Q.SteinbrennerK.BentD. H.SPSS: Statistical package for the social sciences. (2nd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill, 1975.
10.
RotterJ. B.Generalized expectancies for internal vs. external locus of control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 1966, 80, No. 1 (Whole No. 609).
