Factors controlling predatory attack are not well understood. Research has implicated pelage-substrate contrast, movement, proximity, etc. The present study illustrates the divergence of results when all combinations of two pelage and two substrates are used in a predator-prey study. Locating a white mouse on a light-colored substrate required about 6 times as long as other color/substrate combinations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AskewH. R.MusimeciM.SloaneL.StephanL.Effects of prey movement and background on predatory behavior of chameleons. Psychonomic Science, 1970, 20, 17.
2.
BrownL. N.Selection in a population of house mice containing mutant individuals. Journal of Mammalogy, 1965, 46, 461–465.
3.
DiceL. R.Effectiveness of selection by owls of deer-mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) which contrast in color with their background. Comparative Laboratory of Vertebrate Biology, University of Michigan, 1947, 34, 1–20.
4.
KaufmanD. W.Differential owl predation on white and agoutiMus musculus. The Auk, 1974, 19, 145–150.
5.
MuellerH. C.Prey selection: oddity or conspicuousness?Nature, 1968, 217, 92.
6.
SmithG. C.WatsonD.Selection patterns of corn snakes, Elaphe quttata, of difference phenotypes of the house mouse, Mus musculus. Copeia, 1972, 3, 528–531.
7.
SnyderR. L.Some prey preference factors for a red-tailed hawk. The Auk, 1975, 92, 547–552.
8.
SumnerF. B.Evidence for the protective value of changeable coloration in fishes. American Naturalist, 1935, 69, 245–266.
