Studies establishing a positive relationship between dogmatism and reverence for authority have generally dealt with sources of authority which were both untested and unquestionable. This research demonstrated that designated authorities who failed to behave in an authoritative manner were evaluated less favorably by 68 high than by 68 low dogmatics. In addition, “anti-authorities” who behaved in a socially acceptable manner were evaluated more favorably by high than by low dogmatics. This pattern of results is predictable if dogmatism is viewed as a general defense mechanism, with reliance-on-authority functioning to reduce anxiety.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Di RenzoG. J.Dogmatism and orientations toward liturgical change. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 1967, 7, 278.
2.
EhrlichJ. H.LebD.Dogmatism, learning, and resistance to change: Review and a new paradigm. Psychological Bulletin, 1969, 71, 249–260.
3.
FarinaA.RingK.The influence of perceived mental illness on interpersonal relations. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1965, 70, 47–51.
4.
KempG. G.Perception of authority in relation to open and closed belief systems. Science Education, 1963, 47, 482–484.
5.
McCarthyJ.JohnsonR. G.Interpretation of the “city hall riots” as a function of general dogmatism. Psychological Reports, 1962, 11, 243–245.
6.
McGutreW. J.Personality and susceptibility to social influence. In BorgattaE. F.LambertW. W. (Eds.), Handbook of personality theory and research. Chicago: Rand-McNally, 1968. Pp. 1130–1187.
7.
NorrisE. L.Attitude change as a function of open and closed mindedness. Journalism Quarterly, 1965, 42, 571–575.
8.
RokeachM. (Éd.) The open and closed mind. New York: Basic Books, 1960.
9.
SteffensmeierD. J.Levels of dogmatism and attitudes toward law and order. Psychological Reports, 1974, 34, 151–153.
10.
VacchianoR. B.StraussP. S.HochmanL.The open and closed mind: A review of dogmatism. Psychological Bulletin, 1969, 71, 261–273.
11.
VidulichR. N.KaimanI. P.The effects of information source, status and dogmatism upon conformity behavior. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1961, 63, 639–642.
