Abstract
Validity of the interview procedure for selection of students for training in clinical psychology was assessed by comparing the careers and progress of those selected with those rejected at various stages of the selection process. No significant differences emerged. It was also possible to compare careers and progress of students accepted for training on the basis of interview and those accepted prior to or without interview. Again, there were no significant differences. However, when recent students admitted with or without interview were rated on clinical skills and likely future success as clinicians, the interviewed group showed significant advantage. The results are discussed in terms of the cost effectiveness of the interview procedures employed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
