Two studies are reported in this paper. In the first study, the hypothesis that “unattractive” defendants receive more severe recommendations for sentences for a given crime than “attractive” defendants was examined. Race, socioeconomic status, and religious belief were intentionally confounded in the first study with the result that the hypothesis was clearly confirmed. In the second study, race, socioeconomic level, and religious belief were examined in isolation from each other (a 2 × 2 × 2 design) to determine their relative effect on sentencing. Race and belief explained significant proportions of the discriminatory sentencing effect, but socioeconomic status did not. Some preliminary work was done on the effects of perceivers' characteristics, indicating that punitiveness and racial attitudes warrant further study. ‘Subjects were 380 members of organizations for retired persons and church groups.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEE.Struggle for justice. New York: Hill & Wang, 1971.
2.
ArnoldW. R.Race and ethnicity relative to other factors in juvenile court dispositions. American Journal of Sociology, 1971, 77, 211–227.
3.
AshmoreR. D.ButschR.Perceived threat and the perception of violence in biracial settings. Paper presented at the meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Boston, April, 1972.
4.
BrighamJ. C.Racial stereotypes, attitudes, and evaluations of and behavioral intentions toward Negroes and whites. Sociometry, 1971, 34, 360–380.
5.
BullockR.Significance of the racial factor in the length of prison sentences. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 1961, 52, 411–415.
6.
FrankelM.Criminal sentences, law without order. New York: Hill & Wang, 1972.
7.
GoldsteinM.DavisE. E.Race and belief: A further analysis of the social determinants of behavioral intentions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 22, 346–355.
8.
GreenE.Inter and intra-racial crime relative to sentencing. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 1964, 55, 348–354, 356–358.
9.
HendrickC.BixenstineV. F.HawkinsG.Race versus belief similarity as determinants of attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971, 17, 250–258.
10.
HohensteinW. H.Factors influencing the police disposition of juvenile offenders. In SellinT.WolfgangM. E. (Eds.), Delinquency, selected studies. New York: Wiley, 1969. Pp. 138–149.
11.
KalvenH.Jr.ZeiselH.The American jury. Chicago: Univer. of Chicago Press, 1966.
12.
LandyD.AronsonE.The influence of the character of the criminal and his victim on the decisions of simulated jurors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1969, 5, 141–152.
13.
LegantP.The deserving victim: Effects of length of pretrial detention, crime severity, and juror attitudes on simulated jury decisions. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Yale Univer., 1973.
14.
MitchellH. F.ByrneD.The defendant's dilemma: Effects of jurors' attitudes and authoritarianism on judicial decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 25, 123–129.
15.
NagelS.Judicial backgrounds and criminal cases. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 1962, 53, 333–339.
16.
NagelS.WeitzmanL. J.Double standard of American justice. Society, 1972, 9, 18–25.
17.
OverbyA.Discrimination against minority groups. In RadzinowiczL.WolfgangM. E. (Eds.), Crime and justice. Vol. 2. New York: Basic Books, 1971. Pp. 569–581.
18.
RokeachM.SmithP.EvansR.Two kinds of prejudice or one? In RokeachM. (Ed.), The open and closed mind. New York: Basic Books, 1960. Pp. 132–168.
19.
RubinS.Imposition of the death sentence for rape. In RadzinowiczL.WolfgangM. E. (Eds.), Crime and justice. Vol. 2. New York: Basic Books, 1971. Pp. 553–555.
20.
SteinO.HardyckJ.SmithM. B.Race and belief: An open and shut case. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1965, 1, 281–289.
21.
TerryR. M.The screening of juvenile offenders. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 1967, 58, 173–181.
22.
ThornberryT. P.Race, socioeconomic status and sentencing in the juvenile justice system. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 1973, 64, 90–98.
23.
TriandisH. C.A note on Rokeach's theory of prejudice. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1961, 62, 184–186.
24.
WardP. M.Poverty and criminal justice: Appendix C. In Task Force report: Courts, U. S. President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice. Washington, D. C: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1967.
25.
WoodmanseeJ. J.CookS. W.Dimensions of verbal racial attitudes: Their identification and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1967, 7, 240–250.
