Semantic differential and free-association techniques were used to assess preferences for two company names among 20 big game hunters (aged 20 to 43 yr.) from Colorado. One name had more positive stimulus value and more favorable associations. The two techniques provided both confirming and unique data and illustrated the advantages of multiple methods of measurement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnastasiA.Fields of applied psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964.
2.
AndersonR. C.CateoraP. R.Marketing insights. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.1963.
3.
Anonymous.Semantic differential aims to provide qualitative research data. Advertising Age, 1958, 29(36), 3.
4.
DichterE.Handbook of consumer motivations. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964.
FoleyJ. P.Jr.The use of the free association technique in the investigation of the stimulus value of trade names. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1944, 28, 431–435.
7.
KjeldergaardP. M.Attitude toward newscasters as measured by the semantic differential: A descriptive case. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1961, 45, 35–40.
8.
MindakW. A.A new technique for measuring advertising effectiveness. Journal of Marketing, 1956, 20, 367–378.
9.
NunnallyJ. C.Popular conceptions of mental health: Their development and change. New York: Holt, 1961.
10.
NunnallyJ. C.Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
11.
OsgoodC. E.SuciG. J.TannenbaumP. H.The measurement of meaning. Urbana, Ill.: Univer. of Illinois Press, 1957.
