Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

60 female college students were selected on the basis of extreme scores on the Dogmatism Scale and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Trait Anxiety (A-Trait) Scale to work on a computer-assisted learning task of difficult mathematical problems. Contrary to expectations, high and low dogmatic subjects, when controlled for A-Trait, did not differ in the level of state anxiety (A-State) displayed during the learning task. As hypothesized, high A-Trait subjects had significantly higher levels of A-State during the experiment than low A-Trait subjects. Neither A-Trait nor dogmatism was related to errors on the task. However, a significant interactive effect of mathematical ability and A-State on performance was observed. Consistent with drive theory, high A-State resulted in more errors for subjects of low mathematical ability but had no effect on the performance of subjects of high mathematical ability.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Denny

J. P.

Effects of anxiety and intelligence on concept formation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1966, 72, 596–602.

Ehrlich

H. J.

Lee

Dogmatism, learning, and resistance to change: A review and a new paradigm. Psychological Bulletin, 1969, 71, 249–260.

Gaudry

Spielberger

C. D.

Anxiety and intelligence in paired-associate learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1970, 61, 386–391.

Hallenbeck

P. N.

Lundstedt

Some relations between dogmatism, denial and depression. Journal of Social Psychology, 1966, 70, 53–58.

LoScuito

L. A.

Hartley

E. L.

Religious affiliation and open-mindedness in binocular resolution. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1963, 17, 427–430.

O'Neil

H. F.

Jr.

Effects of stress on state anxiety and performance in computer-assisted learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1972, 63, 473–481.

O'Neil

H. F.

Jr. Hansen

D. N.

Spielberger

C. D.

Errors and latency of response as a function of anxiety and task difficulty. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Education Research Association, Los Angeles, 1969.

Rokeach

Political and religious dogmatism: An alternative to the authoritarian personality. Psychological Monographs, 1956, 70, No. 18 (Whole No. 425).

Rokeach

(Ed.) The open and closed mind. New York: Basic Books, 1960.

10.

Rokeach

Restle

A fundamental distinction between open and closed systems. In Rokeach

(Ed.), The open and closed mind. New York: Basic Books, 1960. Pp. 54–70.

11.

Spence

K. W.

A theory of emotionally based drive (D) and its relation to performance in simple learning situations. American Psychologist, 1958, 13, 131–141.

12.

Spielberger

C. D.

The effects of anxiety on complex learning and academic achievement. In Spielberger

C. D.

(Ed.), Anxiety and behavior. New York: Academic Press, 1966. Pp. 361–398. (a)

13.

Spielberger

C. D.

Theory and research on anxiety. In Spielberger

C. D.

(Ed.), Anxiety and behavior. New York: Academic Press, 1966. Pp. 3–20. (b)

14.

Spielberger

C. D.

Anxiety as an emotional state. In Spielberger

C. D.

(Ed.), Anxiety: Current trends in theory and research. New York: Academic Press, 1972. Pp. 23–49.

15.

Spielberger

C. D.

Gorsuch

R. L.

Lushene

R. E.

Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, Calif.: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1970.

16.

Spielberger

C. D.

O'Neil

H. F.

Jr. Hansen

D. N.

Anxiety, drive theory, and computer-assisted learning. In Maher

B. A.

, Progress in experimental personality research. Vol. 6. New York: Academic Press, 1972. Pp. 109–148.

17.

Taylor

J. A.

Drive theory and manifest anxiety. Psychological Bulletin, 1956, 53, 303–320.

18.

Vacchiano

R. B.

Strauss

P. S.

Hochman

The open and closed mind: A review of dogmatism. Psychological Bulletin, 1969, 71, 261–273.

Effects of Dogmatism and Anxiety during Computer-Assisted Learning

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References