3 albino Wistar rats were trained in multiple variable-interval schedules of reinforcement. When reinforcement was withheld during one of the component schedules, the reduction in response rate during that component was accompanied by an increase in responding during the other (unchanged) component. This positive behavioral contrast was statistically significant for all three rats. The results are discussed in relation to interpretations of behavioral contrast based on autoshaping phenomena.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BilbreyJ.WinokurS.Controls for and constraints on autoshaping. J. exp. Anal. Behav., 1973, 20, 323–332.
2.
CataniaA. C.Self-inhibiting effects of reinforcement. J. exp. Anal. Behav., 1973, 19, 517–526.
3.
CataniaA. C.ReynoldsG. S.A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement. J. exp. Anal. Behav., 1968, 11(3, Pt 2).
4.
GamzuE.SchwartzB.The maintenance of key pecking by stimulus-contingent and response-independent food presentation. J. exp. Anal. Behav., 1973, 19, 65–72.
5.
HerrnsteinR. J.On the law of effect. J. exp. Anal. Behav., 1970, 13, 243–266.
6.
PearJ. J.WilkieD. M.Contrast and induction in rats on multiple schedules. J. exp. Anal. Behav., 1971, 15, 289–296.
7.
RachlinH. C.Contrast and matching. Psychol. Rev., 1973, 80, 217–234.
8.
ReynoldsG. S.Behavioral contrast. J. exp. Anal. Behav., 1961, 4, 57–71.
9.
SmithS. G.BorgenL. A.DavisW. M.PaceH. B.Automatic magazine and bar-press training in the rat. J. exp. Anal. Behav., 1971, 15, 197–198.
10.
WestbrookR. F.Failure to obtain positive contrast when pigeons press a bar. J. exp. Anal. Behav., 1973, 20, 499–510.
11.
WilkieD. M.Signalled reinforcement in multiple and concurrent schedules. J. exp. Anal. Behav., 1973, 20, 29–36.
