Abstract
Two concepts of “true score” in test theory are examined. Under one concept, the true score is identified with the expected value of the observed score, and it follows that reliability is the ratio of true variance to observed variance. Under the other concept, the true score is a constant which is not necessarily equal to the expected value of the observed score, and it follows that reliability is not necessarily equal to the ratio of true variance to observed variance. Axioms are presented which encompass both points of view, and explicit formulas relating the two kinds of true scores are derived by representing all scores and components of scores as random variables with the same associated probability space.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
