Underwood's (1952) hypothesis that conceptual behavior is facilitated as instance contiguity of like concepts is increased was examined with concepts which varied in difficulty. The results did not support this hypothesis, wherein a moderate mixture of instances tended to facilitate performance more than a condition of completely unmixed contiguity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BourneL. E.Jr.JenningsP. C.The relationship between response contiguity and classification learning. Journal of General Psychology, 1963, 69, 335–338.
2.
DominowskiR. L.Concept attainment as a function of instance contiguity and number of irrelevant dimensions. Proceedings of the 76th Annual APA Convention, 1968, 3, 41–42.
3.
HaygoodR. C.SandlinJ.YoderD. J.DoddD. H.Instance contiguity in disjunctive concept learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969, 81, 605–607.
4.
HeidbrederE.The attainment of concepts: II. The process. Journal of Psychology, 1947, 24, 93–138.
5.
HullC. L.Quantitative aspects of the evolution of concepts, an experimental study. Psychological Monographs, 1920, 28, 1–123.
6.
KurtzK. H.HovlandC. I.Concept learning with differing sequence of instances. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1956, 51, 239–243.
7.
MayW. W.The relative influence of selected task and treatment variables on human conceptual behavior. Journal of General Psychology, 1972, 86, 65–84.
8.
MayW. W.Stimulus sequence effects in a multiple concept task. Journal of General Psychology, 1974, 90, 279–287.
9.
NewmanS. E.Effects of contiguity and similarity on the learning of concepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1956, 52, 349–353.
10.
SchulzR. W.MillerR. L.RadtkeR. C.The role of instance contiguity and dominance in concept attainment. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1963, 1, 432–435.
11.
UnderwoodB. J.An orientation for research on thinking. Psychological Review, 1952, 59, 209–220.
12.
UnderwoodB. J.Studies of distributed practice: XV. Verbal concept learning as a function of intralist interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1957, 54, 33–40.
