Cognitive and affective attitudes toward the mentally ill were studied in introductory social psychology students categorized on the basis of their dogmatism. On a purely cognitive level highly dogmatic Ss held more stereotypical attitudes toward the mentally ill than low-dogmatic Ss. After a series of regularly scheduled lectures on the social psychology of deviance in a normal classroom situation, highly dogmatic Ss significantly decreased their stereotypical attitudes toward the mentally ill. However, on semantic-differential scales to measure affective attitudes toward the mentally ill highly dogmatic Ss increased their affective rejection of the mentally ill after this series of regularly scheduled lectures. There was no difference between high- and low-dogmatic Ss on an objective test measuring learning with respect to the lectures on deviance. The implications of these data for dogmatism theory are discussed, especially in terms of the relationship between dogmatism, anxiety, and the cognitive and affective rejection of others.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ApplebyL.EllisN. C.RogersG. W.ZimmermanW. A.A psychological contribution to the study of hospital structures. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1961, 17, 390–393.
2.
BryneD.WongT. J.Racial prejudice, interpersonal attraction, and assumed dissimilarity of attitudes. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1962, 65, 246–253.
3.
CohenJ.StrueningE. L.Opinions about mental illness in the personnel of two large mental hospitals. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1962, 64, 349–360.
4.
DohrenwendB. P.Chin-SongE.Social status and attitudes toward psychological disorder: The problem of tolerance of deviance. American Sociological Review, 1967, 32, 417–433.
5.
EhrlichH. J.LeeD.Dogmatism, learning, and resistance to change: A review and a new paradigm. Psychological Bulletin, 1969, 71, 249–260.
6.
FruchterB.RokeachM.NovakE. G.A factorial study of dogmatism, opinionation, and related scales. Psychological Reports, 1958, 4, 19–22.
7.
GenskowJ. K.MaglioneF. D.Familiarity, dogmatism, and reported student attitudes toward the disabled. Journal of Social Psychology, 1965, 67, 329–341.
8.
HoodR. W.Jr.Dogmatism and opinions about mental illness. Psychological Reports, 1973, 32, 1283–1290.
9.
InskoC. A.RobinsonJ. E.Belief similarity versus race as determinants of reaction to Negroes by Southern white adolescents: A further test of Rokeach's theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1967, 7, 216–221.
10.
KornH. A.GiddanN. S.Scoring methods and construct validity of the Dogmatism Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1964, 24, 867–874.
11.
LarsonK. S.Social cost, belief incongruence, and race—experiments in choice behavior. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Convention, Montreal, Canada, September, 1973.
12.
LemkauP. V.CrocettiG. M.A urban population's opinion about mental illness. American Journal of Psychiatry, 1962, 118, 692–700.
13.
MezeiL.Perceived social pressure as an explanation of shifts in the relative influence of race and belief on prejudice across social interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971, 19, 69–81.
14.
NormanR. P.Dogmatism and psychoneurosis in college women. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1966, 30, 278.
15.
NunnallyJ.Popular conceptions of mental health: Their development and change. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1961.
16.
PhillipsD. L.Rejection of the mentally ill: The influence of behavior and sex. American Sociological Review, 1964, 29, 679–687.
17.
PlantW. T.TelfordC. W.ThomasJ. A.Some personality differences between dogmatic and non-dogmatic groups. Journal of Social Psychology, 1965, 67, 67–75.
18.
RebhunM. T.Dogmatism and test anxiety. Journal of Psychology, 1966, 62, 39–40.
19.
RobinsonJ. E.InskoC. A.Attributed belief similarity-dissimilarity versus race as determinants of prejudice: A further test of Rokeach's theory. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 1969, 4, 72–77.
20.
RokeachM.The open and closed mind. New York: Basic Books, 1960.
21.
RokeachM.Comment on Triandis' paper. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1961, 62, 187–188.
22.
RokeachM.FruchterB.A factorial study of dogmatism and related concepts. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1956, 53, 365–360.
23.
RokeachM.MezelL.Race and shared belief as factors in social choice. Science, 1966, 151, 167–172.
24.
RokeachM.SmithP. W.EvansR. I.Two kinds of prejudice or one? In RokeachM. (Ed.), The open and closed mind. New York: Basic Books, 1960. Pp. 132–168.
25.
SteinD. D.The influence of belief systems on interpersonal preference. Psychological Monographs, 1966, 80, No. 8 (Whole No. 616).
26.
SteinD. D.HardwyckJ. A.SmithM. B.Race and belief: An open and shut case. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1965, 4, 281–289.
27.
StichtT. G.FoxW.Geographical mobility and dogmatism, anxiety, and age. Journal of Social Psychology, 1966, 68, 171–174.
28.
TriandisH. C.A note on Rokeach's theory of prejudice. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1961, 62, 184–186.
29.
TriandisH. C.DavisE. E.Race and belief as determinants of behavioral intentions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1965, 2, 715–725.
30.
VacchianoR. B.StraussP. S.HochmanL.The open and closed mind: A review of dogmatism. Psychological Bulletin, 1969, 71, 261–273.
31.
YamamotoK.DizneyH. F.Rejection of the mentally ill: A study of attitudes of student teachers. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1967, 14, 264–268.
