The theory of generalizability (Cronbach, et al., 1972) and Loevinger's (1957) analysis of construct validity are examined in an effort to extend the concept of generalizability and to reformulate some aspects of Loevinger's analysis. Three levels of generalizability emerge from this examination: Generalizability from scale score to location on an unspecified personality dimension (reliability), from scale score to location on a vertically defined personality dimension (trait validity), and from scale score to location on a vertically and horizontally defined personality dimension (nomological validity).
BlalockH. M.Theory construction: From verbal to mathematical formulations. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1969.
3.
CampbellD. T.Recommendations for APA test standards regarding construct, trait, or discriminant validity. American Psychologist, 1960, 15, 546–553.
4.
CampbellD. T.FiskeD. W.Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 1959, 56, 81–105.
5.
CronbachL. J.GleserG. C.NandaH.RajaratnamN.The dependability of behavioral measurements: Theory of generalizability for scores and profiles. New York: Wiley, 1972.
CronbachL. J.RajaratnamN.GleserG. C.Theory of generalizability: A liberalization of reliability theory. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 1963, 16, 137–163.
8.
FiskeD. W.Measuring the concepts of personality. Chicago: Aldine, 1971.
9.
GouletL. R.Anxiety (drive) and verbal learning: Implication for research and some methodological considerations. Psychological Bulletin, 1968, 69, 235–247.
10.
HillW. F.Comments on Taylor's “Drive theory and manifest anxiety.”Psychological Bulletin, 1957, 54, 490–493.
11.
JacksonD. N.Personality Research Form manual. Goshen, N. Y.: Research Psychologists Press, 1967.
JessorR.HammondK. R.Construct validity and the Taylor anxiety scale. Psychological Bulletin, 1957, 54, 161–170.
14.
KaplanA.The conduct of inquiry: Methodology for behavioral science. San Francisco: Chandler, 1964.
15.
LoevingerJ.The attenuation paradox in test theory. Psychological Bulletin, 1954, 51, 493–504.
16.
LoevingerJ.Objective tests as instruments of psychological theory. Psychological Reports, 1957, 3, 635–694.
17.
LoevingerJ.Person and population as psychometric concepts. Psychological Review, 1965, 72, 143–155.
18.
LordF. M.NovickM. R.Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1968.
19.
MeehlP. E.The dynamics of “structured” personality tests. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1945, 1, 296–303.
20.
MeehlP. E.RosenA.Antecedent probability and the efficiency of psychometric signs, patterns, and cutting scores. Psychological Bulletin, 1955, 52, 194–215.
21.
NunnallyJ. C.Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
22.
PeakH.Problems in objective observation. In FestingerL.KatzD. (Eds.), Research methods in the behavioral sciences. New York: Dryden, 1953. Pp. 243–299.
23.
SpenceJ. T.SpenceK. W.The motivational components of manifest anxiety: Drive and drive stimuli. In SpielbergerC. D. (Ed.), Anxiety and behavior. New York: Academic Press, 1966. Pp. 291–326.
24.
TaylorJ. A.The relationship of anxiety to the conditioned eyelid response. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1951, 41, 81–92.
25.
TryonR.Reliability and behavior domain validity: Reformulation and historical critique. Psychological Bulletin, 1957, 54, 229–249.
26.
WigginsJ. S.Personality and prediction: Principles of personality assessment. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1973.
