Abstract
A statistic for describing the reliability of clinical profiles is described. Videotaped interviews are utilized to hold day-to-day variability constant, permitting the evaluation of rater-specific errors. The stability of clinicians' conceptions of the pathology associated with “typical” patients representing various diagnostic categories was evaluated. Even when rater-specific variance is averaged out, patients' observed pathology does not match well with the profile of pathology ascribed to the diagnostic group to which the patient has been clinically assigned.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
