The effectiveness of two classes of verbal reinforcers, correctness and social, were examined among 108 second-, fifth-, and eighth-grade, middle-class children using a marble-sorting task. Results indicated that correctness reinforcement was more rewarding across all levels of age than social approval; however, a post hoc analysis of the age by treatment effect indicated a significant reinforcer effect for only the eighth-grade Ss.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
LewisM.WallA. M.AronfreedJ.Developmental change in the relative values of social and nonsocial reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963, 66, 133–137.
2.
McCullerJ. C.StevensonH. W.Effects of verbal reinforcement in a probability learning situation. Psychological Reports, 1960, 7, 439–445.
3.
PartonD. A.RossA. O.Social reinforcement of children's motor behavior: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 1965, 64, 65–73.
4.
PartonD. A.RossA. O.A reply to “The use of rate as a measure of response in studies of social reinforcement.”Psychological Bulletin, 1967, 67, 323–325.
5.
RosenhanD.GreenwaldJ. A.The effects of age, sex, and socio-economic class on responsiveness to two classes of verbal reinforcement. Journal of Personality, 1965, 33, 108–121.
6.
StevensonH. W.Social reinforcement of children's behavior. In LipsittL. P.SpikerC. C. (Eds.), Advances in child development and behavior. Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press, 1965. Pp. 97–125.
7.
StevensonH. W.Children's learning. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1972.
8.
StevensonH. W.HillK. T.Use of rate as a measure of response in studies of social reinforcement. Psychological Bulletin, 1966, 66, 321–326.
9.
WinerB. J.Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.
10.
ZiglerE.KanzerP.The effectiveness of two classes of verbal reinforcers on the performance of middle- and lower-class children. Journal of Personality, 1962, 30, 157–163.
