15 human Ss received alternating sequences of 0- and variable 15-sec. delay of reinforcement on a FR 15 schedule lever-pulling task. Groups of 5 Ss received either rate instructions to maximize reinforcement or correct responses, or no instructions. Results indicate that delay of reinforcement reduced response rates only for Ss with rate instructions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaronA.KaufmanA.StauberK. A.The effects of instructions and reinforcement feedback on human operant behavior maintained by fixed-interval reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1969, 12, 701–712.
2.
BlairW. C.Measurement of observing responses in human monitoring. Science, 1958, 128, 255–256.
3.
KaufmanA.BaronA.KoppR. M.Some effects of instructions on human operant behavior. Psychonomic Monograph Supplements, 1966, 1, 243–250.
SkinnerB. F.Operant behavior. In HonigW. K. (Ed.), Operant behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1966. Pp. 12–32.
6.
WeinerH.Some effects of response costs upon human operant behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1962, 5, 201–208.
7.
WeinerH.Instructional control of human operant responding during extinction following fixed-ratio conditioning. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1970, 13, 391–394.