Assumptions regarding parent-child interaction patterns are combined to generate the prediction that firstborns exhibit a greater tendency to adopt the role of being sick than do later-borns. Data from 152 student volunteers are consistent with this prediction.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
KammeyerK. C. W.Birth order as a research variable. Social Forces, 1967, 46, 71–81.
2.
KaslS. V.CobbS.Health behavior, illness behavior, and sick role behavior. Archives of Environmental Health, 1966, 12, 246–266, 531–541.
3.
MechanicD.VolkartE. H.Stress, illness behavior, and the sick role. American Sociological Review, 1961, 26, 51–58.
4.
SampsonE. E.The study of ordinal position: Antecedents and outcomes. In MaherB. A. (Ed.), Progress in experimental personality research. Vol. II. New York: Academic Press, 1965. Pp. 175–228.
5.
WaldropM. F.Effects of family size and density on newborn characteristics. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1965, 35, 342–343. (Abstract)
6.
WeissJ. H.Birth order and physiological stress response. Child Development, 1970, 41, 461–470.
