The effects of anxiety on storage and retrieval processes in short-term memory were investigated. 8-word units of high and low encodability were tested under conditions of free and prompted recall using strong or weak cues. Results during both test periods showed superior recall under conditions of strong cueing, high encodability, and low anxiety. An interpretation localizing the effects of anxiety in trace formation or storage phases was favored over a retrieval interpretation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BattigW. F.MontagueW. E.Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories; replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969, 80, Monogr. Suppl. 2.
2.
BorkowskiJ. G.MannT.Effects of anxiety and interference on short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968, 78, 352–354.
3.
MeltonA. W.Implications of short-term memory for a general theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1963, 2, 1–21.
4.
PetersonL. R.PetersonM. J.Short-term retention of individual items. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1959, 58, 193–198.
5.
SpenceK. W.Behavior theory and conditioning. New Haven: Yale Univer. Press, 1956.
6.
TaylorJ. A.A personality scale of manifest anxiety. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1953, 48, 285–290.
7.
ThomsonD. M.TulvingE.Associative encoding and retrieval: Weak and strong cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970, 86, 255–262.
8.
WeinerB.WalkerE. L.Motivational factors in short-term retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1966, 71, 190–193.
9.
WickensD. D.SimpsonC. K.Trace cue position, motivation, and short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968, 76, 282–285.
