Convergence among several indices of personality-item difficulty was assessed. Controversiality, item response variance, response time, and difficulty ratings showed consistent convergence, while ambiguity did not. Variance analyses indicated that the usual item-statistic approach (collapsing over Ss) results in the loss of considerable variance from the original item X persons data matrix.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BlockJ.The challenge of response sets: Unconfounding meaning, acquiescence, and social desirability in the MMPI. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1965.
2.
EdwardsA. L.The relationship between the judged desirability of a trait and the probability that the trait will be endorsed. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1953, 37, 90–93.
3.
EndlerN. S.HuntJ. M.S-R inventories of hostility and comparisons of the proportions of variance from persons, responses, and situations for hostility and anxiousness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968, 9, 309–315.
4.
FiskeD. W.Measuring the concepts of personality. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton, 1971.
5.
FrickeB. G.A response bias (B) scale for the MMPI. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1957, 4, 149–153.
6.
GoldbergL. R.A model of item ambiguity in personality assessment. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1963, 23, 467–492.
7.
HanleyC.Deriving a measure of test-taking defensiveness. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1957, 21, 391–397.
8.
HanleyC.The “difficulty” of a personality inventory item. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1962, 22, 577–584.
9.
JacksonD. N.Acquiescence response styles: Problems of identification and control. In BergI. A. (Ed.), Response set in personality assessment. Chicago: Aldine, 1967. Pp. 71–114. (a)
10.
JacksonD. N.Manual for the Personality Research Form. Goshen, N. Y.: Research Psychologists Press, 1967. (b)
11.
JonesR. R.GoldbergL. R.Interrelationships among personality scale parameters: Item response stability and scale reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1967, 27, 323–333.
12.
MessickS.JacksonD. N.Desirability scale values and dispersions for MMPI items. Psychological Reports, 1961, 8, 409–414.
13.
NormanW. T.On estimating psychological relationships: Social desirability and self report. Psychological Bulletin, 1967, 67, 273–293.
14.
RogersT. B.The process of responding to personality items: Some issues, a theory and some research. Multivariate Behavioral Research Monographs, 1971, No. 6.
15.
RorerL. G.The great response-style myth. Psychological Bulletin, 1965, 63, 129–156.
16.
SutherlandB. V.SpilkaB.Social desirability, item-response time, and item significance. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1964, 28, 447–451.
17.
TorgersonW. S.Theory and methods of scaling. New York: Wiley, 1958.
18.
TrottD. M.JacksonD. N.An experimental analysis of acquiescence. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 1967, 2, 278–288.
19.
WinerB. J.Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.
