Cutter and Heilizer (1971) suggested the use of adjusted interaction means for examining interactions in analysis of variance designs. However, the adjusted interaction means were estimates of the parameter, αβIJ, which represents the interaction between the Ith level of factor A and the Jth level of factor B. Therefore, estimated would have been more straightforward terminology than adjusted interaction means.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CutterH. S. G.HeilizerF.Logic of analysis of variance in relation to predictions and evaluations of interaction means. Psychological Reports, 1971, 28, 839–842.
2.
MarascuiloL. A.LevinJ. R.Appropriate post hoc comparisons for interaction and nested hypotheses in analysis of variance designs: The elimination of Type IV errors. American Educational Research Journal, 1970, 7, 397–421.
3.
WinerB. J.Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.
