The evidence for the utility of a latent inhibition procedure, namely, nonreinforced preexposure of the to-be conditioned stimuli, for behavioral prophylaxis, is examined The phenomenon has wide representation in a variety of species and learning tasks. Although it is only found under very restricted conditions in adult human Ss, it is more easily demonstrated in children. It is concluded that there may indeed be a useful clinical application of latent inhibition but additional research is required both to validate the approach and to identify critical parameters.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenJ. A.Latent inhibition: Generalization during eyelid conditioning. Unpublished master's thesis, North Carolina State Univer., 1967.
2.
CantorG. N.Stimulus familiarization effect and the change effect in children's motor task behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 1969, 71, 144–160.
3.
GrantD. A.HakeH. W.RiopelleA. J.KostlanA.Effects of repeated pretesting with conditioned stimulus upon extinction of the conditioned eyelid response to light. American Journal of Psychology, 1951, 64, 247–251.
4.
GrantD. A.HakeH. W.SchneiderD. E.Effects of pre-testing with the conditioned stimulus upon extinction of the conditioned eyelid response. American Journal of Psychology, 1948, 61, 243–246.
5.
KuboseS. K.The stimulus familiarization effect as a function of stimulus similarity. Psychonomic Science, 1970, 18, 367–368.
6.
LubowR. E.Latent inhibition: Effects of frequency of non-reinforced preexposure to the CS. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1965, 60, 454–455.
7.
LubowR. E.Latent inhibition. Psychological Bulletin, in press.
8.
LubowR. E.MooreA. U.Latent inhibition: The effect of nonreinforced pre-exposure to the conditional stimulus. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1959, 52, 416–419.
9.
LubowR. E.SiebertL.Latent inhibition within the CER paradigm. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1969, 68, 136–138.
10.
MeyerW. J.JosephL. J.Response speed as related to CS prefamiliarization and GSR responsitivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968, 78, 375–381.
11.
PerlmuterL. C.Effect of CS manipulation on the conditioned eyelid response: Compounding, generalization, the inter-CS-interval, and preexposure. Psychonomic Science Monographs, 1966, 1, 271–286.
12.
PoserE. G.Toward a theory of “behavioral prophylaxis.”Journal of Behavioral Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 1970, 1, 39–43.
13.
PoserE. G.BaumM.SkinnerC.CS pre-exposure as a means of “behavioral prophylaxis”: An animal paradigm. Proceedings of the 78th American Psychological Association Meeting, 1970, 6, 521–522.
14.
SchnurP.Latent inhibition: The effects of nonreinforced preexposure of the CS in differential eyelid conditioning. Unpublished master's thesis, North Carolina State Univer., 1967.
15.
SchnurP.KsirC. J.Latent inhibition in human eyelid conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969, 80, 388–389.
16.
SiebertL. E.The role of the orienting response in latent inhibition using Ivanov-Smolenskii conditioning. Unpublished master's thesis, North Carolina State Univer., 1967.
17.
SilverA. I.Effects of prior CS presentations on classical conditioning of the GSR. Paper presented at the Southern Society for Philosophy and Psychology, Athens, Georgia, 1972.
18.
SokolovE. N.Perception and the conditioned reflex. New York: Pergamon, 1963.
19.
SokolovE. N.ParamanovaN. P.Concerning the role of the orientation reflex in the formation of motor conditioned reactions in man. Journal of Higher Nervous Activity, 1956, 6, 702–709. [Cited by SokolovE. N., Perception and the conditioned reflex. New York: Pergamon, 1963. P. 249.].
20.
SpenceK. W.Cognitive and drive factors in the extinction of the conditioned eyeblink in human subjects. Psychological Review, 1966, 73, 445–448.
21.
SurwitR. W.The anticipatory modification of the conditioning of a fear response in humans. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McGill Univer., 1972.
22.
WolffC.MaltzmanI.Conditioned orienting reflex and amount of pre-conditioning habituation. Proceedings of the American Psychological Association, 1968, 3, 129–130.
23.
ZeinerA. R.Orienting response and discrimination conditioning. Physiology and Behavior, 1970, 5, 641–646.
