An alternative hypothesis explaining the greater proportion of True responses given by Ss with low scores on the R scale of the MMPI when compared with Ss with high scores on the R scale was not supported in two experiments. The results supported the original hypothesis of Edwards and Abbott that the R scale is measuring in some degree the tendency to respond True to personality items and trait adjectives without regard to the substantive content of these items.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbbottR. D.FryR. M.Keim-AbbottS.The R scale of the MMPI as a measure of acquiescence: Replication for non-pathological content trait adjectives. Psychological Reports, 1972, 31, 806.
2.
EdwardsA. L.The measurement of personality traits by scales and inventories. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1970.
3.
EdwardsA. L.AbbottR. D.Further evidence regarding the R scale of the MMPI as a measure of acquiescence. Psychological Reports, 1969, 24, 903–906.
4.
EdwardsA. L.AbbottR. D.The R scale and acquiescent tendencies on scales consisting of items from the CPI, PRF, and EPI. Psychological Reports, 1972, 31, 303–306.
5.
EdwardsA. L.WalshJ. A.Relationships between various psychometric properties of personality items. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1963, 23, 227–238.
6.
GyntherM. D.GrayB. G.StraussM. E.Effects of religious affiliation, religious involvement, and sex on the social desirability ratings of MMPI religion items. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1970, 34, 338–342.
