It was hypothesized that analysis of patient's length of communication would indicate differential preferences to selected therapist's proxemic cues. Ss responded to 72 pictures depicting a quasi-psychotherapeutic interaction. The results suggested that the paralinguistic variable of length of communication may have some utility in yielding an unobtrusive measure of an individual's attitude or affect.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BoucherM. L.Effect of seating distance on interpersonal attraction in an interview situation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1972, 38, 15–19.
2.
CharneyE. J.Postural configurations in psychology. Psychosomatic Medicine, 1966, 28, 305–315.
3.
DittmannA. T.ParloffM. B.BoomerD. S.Facial and body expressions: A study of receptivity of emotional cues. Psychiatry, 1965, 28, 239–244.
4.
EkmanP.FriesenW. V.Nonverbal behavior in psychotherapy research. In ShlienJ. M. (Eds), Research in psychotherapy. Vol. III. Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association, 1968. Pp. 179–216.
5.
HaaseR. F.TepperD. T.Nonverbal components of empathic communication. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1972, 19, 417–424.
6.
HinchliffeM. K.LancashireM.RobertsF. J.A study of eye contact changes in depressed and recovered psychiatric patients. British Journal of Psychiatry, 1971, 119, 213–215.
7.
KellyF. D.Communicational significance of therapist proxemic cues. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1972, 39, 345.
8.
MahlG. P.Measures of two expressive aspects of a patient's speech in two psychotherapeutic interviews. In GottschalkL. A. (Eds), Comparative psycholinguistic analysis of two psychotherapeutic interviews. New York: International Univer. Press, 1961. Pp. 91–114.
9.
MatarazzoJ. D.WiensA. N.MatarazzoR. G.SaslowG.Speech and silence behavior in clinical psychotherapy and its laboratory correlates. In ShlienJ. M. (Eds), Research in psychotherapy. Vol. III. Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association, 1968. Pp. 347–394.
10.
MatarazzoJ. D.WiensA. N.SaslowG.Studies in interview speech behavior. In KrasnerL.UllmannL. P. (Eds.), Research in behavior modification: New developments and clinical implications. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1965. Pp. 179–210.
11.
MehrabianA.Communication length as an index of communicator attitude. Psychological Reports, 1965, 17, 519–522.
12.
MehrabianA.A semantic space for nonverbal behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1970, 35, 248–257.
13.
MehrabianA.FerrisS. J.Inference of attitudes from nonverbal communication in two channels. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1967, 31, 248–252.
14.
PittengerR. E.SmithH. L.A basis for some contributions of linguistics to psychiatry. Psychiatry, 1957, 20, 61–78.
15.
ScheflenA. E.The significance of posture in communication systems. Psychiatry, 1964, 27, 316–331.
16.
WardC. D.Length of attitude statements as an indicator of attitude. Psychological Reports, 1970, 27, 398.
17.
WienerM.MehrabianA.Language within language; immediacy, a channel in verbal communication. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1968.
