Exp. I showed that the probability of disclosing bad news about a best friend to that best friend was high for males and females. But Exp. II, conducted at a more impersonal level, indicated that females but not males exercised a low probability of revealing bad news to a best friend. It was concluded that to comprehend the parameters of a psychology of secrets, we must know more about the capabilities and intent of the secret bearer.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BakanD.On method. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1967.
2.
CastellanN.Jr.On the partitioning of contingency tables. Psychological Bulletin, 1965, 64, 330–338.
3.
ChapanisA.Prelude to 2001: Explorations in human communication. American Psychologist, 1971, 26, 949–961.
4.
JourardS.Self-disclosure. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1971.
5.
TesserA.RosenS.BatchelorT.On the reluctance to communicate bad news (the MUM effect): A role-play extension. Journal of Personality, 1972, 40, 88–103.
