2 field studies of the selective exposure hypotheses were conducted in 2 settings. Using ad lib. techniques with unobtrusive Es, the results failed to consistently support the hypotheses. Ss classified as Hawks demonstrated selectiveness, Doves did not.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrockT. C.BallounJ. L.Behavioral receptivity to dissonant information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1967, 6, 413–428.
2.
FestingerL.A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, Ill.: Row, Peterson, 1957.
3.
LowinA.Further evidence for an approach-avoidance interpretation of selective exposure. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1969, 5, 265–271.
4.
SearsD. O.The paradox of de facto selective exposure without preference for supportive information. In AbelsonR. P. (Eds.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1968. Pp. 777–787.
