An attempt to use Gittinger's Personality Assessment System as a diagnostic tool did not yield statistically significant results for a sample of 318 children in 9 diagnostic groups. However, in this sample, there were many clear-cut sex differences in WISC performance and some evidence of interaction among age, sex, and diagnostic classifications. None of the observed differences proved useful in differentiation among these Ss.
SaundersD. R.An outline of Gittinger's personality theory as applied to the Wechsler. (Research Mem. 59–3) Princeton: Educational Testing Service, 1959. (a)
4.
SaundersD. R.On the dimensionality of the WAIS battery for two groups of normal males. Psychological Reports, 1959, 5, 529–541. (b)
5.
SaundersD. R. Evidence for the relative primitivity of certain traits. In ThetfordW. N. (Chm.), Multitrait, multilevel personality assessment: Theory, measurement, evaluation. Symposium presented at the American Psychological Association, Philadelphia, September, 1963.
6.
SaundersD. R.GittingerJ. W.Patterns of intellectual functioning and their implications for the dynamics of behavior. In KatzM. M.ColeJ. O.BartonW. E. (Eds.) The role and methodology of classification in psychiatry and psychopathology. Washington, D. C.: Government Printing Office, 1969. Pp. 377–390. (USPHS No. 1584).
SchucmanH.ThetfordW. N.Expressed symptoms and personality traits in conversion hysteria. Psychological Reports, 1968, 23, 231–243.
9.
SchucmanH.ThetfordW. N.A comparison of personality traits in ulcerative colitis and migraine patients. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1970, 76, 443–452.
10.
ThetfordW. N.SchucmanH.Personality patterns in migraine and ulcerative colitis patients. Psychological Reports, 1968, 23, 1206.
11.
WinneJ. F.A summary of the Personality Assessment System. Washington, D. C.: Psychological Assessment Assoc., 1966.
