The present experiment investigated the effects of noncontingent nonreinforcement as the aversive event in a CER paradigm. The results showed a significant response-facilitation effect during early training, but none during later training with a high rate-producing, high-density reinforcement schedule. The present results imply that a low rate-producing, high-density reinforcement schedule is not a necessary condition for response facilitation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnnauZ.KaminL. J.The conditioned emotional response as a function of intensity of the UCS. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1961, 54, 428–433.
2.
EstesW. K.SkinnerB. F.Some quantitative properties of anxiety. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1941, 29, 390–400.
3.
KaufmanA.Response suppression in the CER paradigm with extinction as the aversive event. Psychonomic Science, 1969, 15, 15–17.
4.
LeitenbergH.Conditioned acceleration and conditioned suppression in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1966, 9, 205–212.
5.
ParkerB. K.BarkerD. L.ToppingJ.The differential effects of timeout and shock on DRL responding in the CER paradigm. Psychonomic Science, 1971, 22, 133–135.
