It was hypothesized that there would be a positive relationship between the number of stimuli identified by Ss as reinforcing (together with the reinforcing value of the identified stimuli) and self-labeled depression-elation. 81 Ss were administered the Reinforcement Survey Schedule and a depression-elation scale. The hypothesis was not supported, with non-significant (p > .05) correlation coefficients occurring for both males and females.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CautelaJ.KastenbaumR.A reinforcement survey schedule for use in therapy, training, and research. Psychological Reports, 1967, 20, 1115–1130.
2.
FersterC. B.Classification of behavior pathology. In KrasnerL. & UllmannL. P. (Eds.), Research in behavior modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1965. Pp. 6–26.
3.
LazarusA. A.Learning theory and the treatment of depression. Behavior Research and Therapy, 1968, 6, 83–89.
4.
LewinsohnP. M.AtwoodG. E.Depression: a clinical research approach. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 1969, 6, 166–171.
5.
MendelsJ.Concepts of depression. New York: Wiley, 1970.
6.
WilsonW.Correlates of avowed happiness. Psychological Bulletin, 1967, 67, 294–306.
7.
WolpeJ.The practice of behavior therapy. New York: Pergamon, 1970.
