46 men and 42 women of college age received 6 statements representing each S's own highest scales on the Personality Research Form and MMPI and randomly selected items. The ranks given items showed greater endorsement of items from their own profiles.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BringmannW. G.BalanceW. D. G.Programmierte Persoenlichkeitsgutachten: Theorie, klinische Praxis, Lehre und Forschung. In SzewczykH. (Chm.), Internationales Symposium fuer medizinische Psychologie. Martin-Luther-Universitaet, HalleG. D. R., May, 1971.
2.
DregerR. M.Objective personality tests and computer processing of personality test data. In BergI. A. & PenningtonL. A. (Eds.), An introduction to clinical psychology. New York: Ronald, 1966. Pp. 154–190.
3.
FinneyJ. C.Methodological problems in programmed composition of psychological test reports. Behavioural Science, 1967, 12, 142–152.
4.
FowlerR. D.Computer interpretation of personality tests: the automated psychologist. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 1967, 8, 455–467.
5.
FowlerR. D.The current status of computer interpretation of psychological tests. American Journal of Psychiatry, 1969, 125, 21–27.
